“Promising” and “Inaction” in the Evaluation of Academic Journals: Thoughts on the Construction of Academic Credibility Value

Abstract

Comparatively speaking, academic credibility has dual tension at system and the value level, which cannot be replaced by academic administrative power. Academic evaluation and academic research are integrated and inseparable, and the process of academic journal evaluation and its own development cannot be separated from the participation of academic community. At present, it is urgent to build academic credibility based on academic spontaneous order at the boundary between administrative power and academic power, and strengthen the maintenance of credibility by scientific rigid system norms, so as to form consistent action and self-discipline of academic community and constantly improve academic ecology.