Thematic Questions on Economic Theory and Sustainability Vision

Abstract

The thematic issues on sustainability presented in this article are essentially two: Primus, the classic development line of economies moves in a direct line and with a cautious slop in respect of the least damage of nature. Second, the importance of the community or rather of its majority, at the level of individual countries and at the global level, in the role of holder of responsibility for the survival of life up to a distant future. It follows that the alterations that govern the economy (the economic cycle and its handmaids, inflation, and deflation) are alterations due to errors in the management of human activity. Alterations which are symptoms of diseases but also cures to bring the economic system back to path of linear growth. So, deciding to oppose these anomalies can be a serious mistake like giving up medicine because it is bitter. The function of the majority in a community can be essential for a gradual return to the classic path of development. The majority it is the anticipated perceiver of the state of the cycle, whose evolution, for the better or worse, depends on the moods, favorable or pessimistic, on the prospects. In other words, it is always the majority who anticipate, with the yardstick of consumption and investments in program, the decline or recovery of the cycle, which will be sanctioned later by the statistical data. Having said this, it’s not just suggestive the hypothesis that the cyclical and monetary anomalies are connected, according to the anthropic principle, to the laws of nature that allow life on the planet; but they also oversee in some way to development of the economy, that is, of life in our galaxy. On the other hand, how do the disturbances that shake the economy develop? What entities or laws control them? Above all, they have always the usual repetitive shape over time. Tools also for the care of the economy and for the maintenance of life.