Popular Uprisings in Sudan: Revolutionary Processes Intercepted

Abdu Mukhtar Musa

Abstract


This article tries to go beyond the general features of the Sudanese three popular Uprisings of 1964, 1985 and 2018/19, to explore their root causes. It argues that the revolutionary processes in the Sudan have been impeded by such factors as: (1) lack of visionary leaders; (2) inter-elites dissensions; (3) intra-party schisms and inter-party conflicts (over interests); and (4) absence of coherent programmatic and mass political parties. Since independence in 1956, the Sudan has been trapped in a vicious circle—oscillating between democratic and military rules. So: “why does democracy fail in Sudan? It compares the different settings that differentiate the Uprising (of 2018/19) from the previous two, with especial emphasis on the latest one—one of the most successful non-violent civil resistances. The article explains that those uprisings could have escalated into full-fledged revolution but were let down by the civil elites who disappointed any prospects for revolutionary achievement. Hence, the article rests on the hypothesis that the political elite are responsible for the failure of the popular uprisings in Sudan. The article provides empirical explanations for this hypothesis and suggests adoption of consociationalism which is more likely to suit the highly diversified Sudanese society with deep ethno-political polarization.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/ape.v5n1p1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © SCHOLINK INC.  ISSN 2576-1382 (Print)  ISSN 2576-1390 (Online)