To Peace, or Not to Peace: The Prospect of “Peace” in the Gaza Strip and West Bank

Abstract

In the protracted and deeply rooted Israel-Palestine conflict, efforts toward lasting peace remain fraught with complexity and division. Historical animosities, entrenched ideological divides, and cycles of violence have shaped a volatile region where conventional solutions often fall short. This article examines key moments, such as the Second Intifada and the October 7 Hamas attack, to underscore the systemic challenges that have perpetuated unrest. While the one-state and two-state models have dominated discourse, this analysis advocates for a more pragmatic approach, prioritizing humanitarian relief, regional stability, and incremental trust-building measures. Through a focus on shared security frameworks, enhanced Palestinian autonomy, and robust international engagement—particularly by the United States—the paper explores actionable steps that could reduce hostilities and establish a foundation for peace. By embracing realistic strategies grounded in mutual interests, the path to a more secure and just future for both Israelis and Palestinians may still be attainable.