A Review of Researches on English for Specific Purposes and the Implications for Its Development in China

Meisong Chen, Xia Zhao, Jiegen Zhang

Abstract


This paper provides a comprehensive review of English for Specific Purposes research, comparing the characteristics and trends of both international and Chinese studies. Drawing on a selection of papers from English for Specific Journal, the internationally leading ESP journal, and Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) publications, the analysis reveals several key findings. Internationally, ESP research is characterized by a focus on the use of English as a lingua franca, the development and application of English for Academic Purposes (EAP), and English for Occupational Purposes (EOP). Studies delve into the complexities of language use across diverse fields, examining the impact of cultural differences, communication challenges, and the evolving nature of ESP teaching and learning. In China, ESP research has evolved to emphasize the need for localized approaches tailored to the country’s specific educational context. There is a clearer orientation in EAP and EOP related studies, and a rapid development of studies on classroom teaching. Research in China also highlights the role of information technology in transforming ESP teaching, with a growing emphasis on the integration of digital tools and platforms. The paper identifies several implications for ESP research in China. Firstly, there is a need for greater investment in research, both in terms of quantity and quality, to address the increasing demand for ESP expertise. Secondly, Chinese scholars should continue to explore teaching and research models that are contextually relevant, particularly in the context of the “Belt and Road” initiative. Thirdly, greater engagement with the international academic community is crucial for promoting Chinese perspectives and contributing to global ESP discourse. Finally, research methods should be enhanced, with a greater emphasis on empirical studies and the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches.


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v6n6p1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © SCHOLINK INC.  ISSN 2640-9836 (Print)  ISSN 2640-9844 (Online)